Audit Judgement In Task Complexity, Self Efficacy, and Auditor Professional Skepticism
Article Sidebar
Abstract Views: 0
File Views: 0
Main Article Content
Abstract
The presentation of quality audit reports does not necessarily occur without problems, including in the provision of audit judgments by auditors who are faced with task complexity and auditor confidence in their abilities including skepticism. The study was conducted with the aim of examining the impact of task complexity, self-efficacy and professional skepticism of auditors on policy making in audit judgement with internal auditors at the regional inspectorate of Central Sulawesi. A total of 32 respondents who met the criteria in determining the sample using purposive sampling with a survey approach. The results showed that the effect caused in giving audit judgments on task complexity, self efficacy, and professional skepticism of internal auditors was significant. The results of the study can be a reference for further research in developing audit judgment and can be material in developing the ability of internal auditors to convince themselves of the decisions given in the audit results
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Adipraja, M. A. (2021). The Influence of Auditor Independence, Auditor Competence, and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments at Food & Beverage Companies Period 2016-2020. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 9992–9997.
Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Aimran, N. (2020). An extensive comparison of cb-sem and pls-sem for reliability and validity. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.003
Amanda, R., Haliah, H., & Kusumawati, A. (2023). The Influence of Task Complexity, Self-Efficacy, and Audit Risk on Auditor Performance at Public Accounting Office (Kap) in Makassar City. Journal of Social Research, 2(6), 2154–2160.
Ansar, M., Irianto, G., & Jurana, N. S. (2023). Refleksi yin dan yang sebagai teropong perseptif audit berkualitas. Penerbit Peneleh.
Atmaja, I. W., & Sukartha, I. M. (2021). The influence of self efficacy, professional, sketicism, and gender o auditors on audit judgement. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 643–650.
Auzar, A., Anwar, S., & Widajantie, T. D. (2020). BAJ ( Behavioral Accounting Journal ). Analisis Implementasi Pendidiakn Kewirausahan, 3(1), 1–14.
Baatwah, S. R., Al-Ansi, A. A., Almoataz, E. S., & Salleh, Z. (2023). Self-efficacy, remote audit proficiency, effort, and performance in the COVID-19 crisis: an auditor’s perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 38(6), 832–862.
Bawias, H. H. B., Yusuf, R. M., & Paranoan, S. (2025). Silent Revolution : Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Students ’ Career Interest in Taxation. KLABAT Accounting Review (KAR), 6(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.60090/kar.v6i1.1247.13-23
Chen, Y.-H., Wang, K.-J., & Liu, S.-H. (2023). How Personality Traits and Professional Skepticism Affect Auditor Quality? A Quantitative Model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1547.
Deliu, D. (2020). Elevating professional reasoning in auditing. Psycho-professional factors affecting auditor’s professional judgement and skepticism. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research and Practice, 20(2), 46–80.
Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2021). Improving complex audit judgments: A framework and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 2071–2104.
Hamdam, A., Jusoh, R., Yahya, Y., Abdul Jalil, A., & Zainal Abidin, N. H. (2022). Auditor judgment and decision-making in big data environment: a proposed research framework. Accounting Research Journal, 35(1), 55–70.
Haryanto, N. O., & Susilawati, C. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Auditor Internal Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v16i2.1694
Hilman, N., Laekkeng, M., & Amiruddin, A. (2021). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, skeptisme profesional, kompetensi auditor, dan e-audit terhadap kualitas hasil audit pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Kota Makassar. Invoice: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 3(2), 303–332.
Ignatia, O. M. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Pemecahan Masalah, Kematangan Audit, Aktivitas Komputer Audit Terhadap Kinerja Audit Internal. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v16i2.2252
Kiswati, N. B., & Sudaryati, E. (2021). Peran Mediasi Skeptisisme Auditor Pada Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1043–1044.
Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 553–568.
Maradona, A. F. (2020). A Qualitative Exploration of Heuristics and Cognitive Biases in Auditor Judgements. Accountability, 9(2), 94–112.
Muslim, M., Pelu, M. F. A. R., & Mentari, K. S. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Bongaya Journal of Research in Accounting (BJRA), 1(2), 8–17.
Noviranza, R., & Haq, A. (2024). PENGARUH AUDIT KNOWLEDGE, AUDIT EXPERIENCE, SELF-EFFICACY TERHADAP AUDIT JUDGEMENT: PERAN KOMPLEKSITAS TUGAS SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING. EBID: Ekonomi Bisnis Digital, 2(1), 27–38.
Nugrahaeni, S., Samin, S., & Nopiyanti, A. (2019). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Kompetensi, Independensi Dan Kompleksitas Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 21(2), 181–198.
Nurfadillah, Y., Mustika, R., & Yentifa, A. (2022). Peran Audit Internal dalam Pencegahan Fraud pada Sektor Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus pada Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Indonesia (JABEI), 1(2), 18–22.
Permata Sari, G., & Lily Indarto, S. (2019). Pengaruh Pergantian Auditor, Tenur Audit, dan Frekuensi Rapat Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan dengan Kualitas Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 230–245.
Saha, R. (2022). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Accounting Research. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, 1(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56815/ijmrr.v1.i2.2022/1-6
Sanjaya, A. (2017). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi, Kompetensi, Pelatihan Auditor, Dan Resiko Audit Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 15(1), 42–55.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer.
Tempomona, I. A. O., Yusuf, R. M., & Paranoan, S. (2023). Urgensi Artificial Intelligence Dalam Transformasi Akuntan(Si). Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(3), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.3.37
Tiron-Tudor, A., & Deliu, D. (2022). Reflections on the human-algorithm complex duality perspectives in the auditing process. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 19(3), 255–285.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2017). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Salemba Empat.
Tumurang, D. O., Ilat, V., & Kalalo, M. Y. B. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Auditor Pada Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(3).
Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203–215.
Weiner, B., & Weiner, B. (1985). Attribution theory. Human Motivation, 275–326.
West, A., & Buckby, S. (2023). Professional judgement in accounting and Aristotelian practical wisdom. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(1), 120–145.
Zare Bidoki, F., Arefmanesh, Z., & Barzegari Khaneghah, J. (2023). The Effect of Goal Orientation on Auditors’ Judgment Performance with the Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy. Journal of Social Behavior and Community Health, 7(1), 1061–1071.